Digital Footprints Start in Diapers: Why Parents Must Pause Before Posting"

July 23, 2025
shad Khattab

“The average child has 1,300+ photos of themselves online before age 13.”


Why We Share (And Why It Got Messy)

     One of my favorite things about early Facebook was watching friends’ and relatives’ kids grow up from a distance. You can’t visit everyone. Social filled that gap. We posted everything—opinions, trips, memes (hysterical and not), tragedies, MLM pitches, and yes, our kids’ photos. Obnoxious politics too—present company included.

For a lot of parents here and around the world, sharing milestones became part of daily life. I used to think the data tracking behind it wasn’t a big deal. Then 13 years in digital marketing taught me exactly how the surveillance machine works. Those old lines—I’m not doing anything wrong, why should I care? What could they possibly do with it?—don’t survive contact with reality.

I joined Facebook to connect with family overseas and across the U.S. Weddings, newborns, first days of school—it was all there, and I loved it. But this conversation isn’t nostalgia; it’s about consent, safety, and digital dignity.

The Consent Problem

     We live in the “Age of Consent,” but most parents don’t ask kids before posting their pictures or stories. And even if a child says “yes,” can they understand what it means to have their image, milestones, and personal details online—forever?

Grown adults post dumb things and pay for it later. How would a child possibly anticipate what today’s “cute” post might mean in ten years? Today’s yes isn’t tomorrow’s comfort. Future embarrassment, bullying, or identity issues are very real outcomes.

Digital Permanence & Lack of Control

     Deleting photos, blocking accounts, and other “failsafes” feel reassuring—but they’re leaky. We don’t have a legal right to disappear in the U.S., and most places don’t either.

That bathtub photo you posted in 2014? It’s not just in Grandma’s feed. It could be scraped into a facial-recognition database, used to train an AI model, or sitting on a forgotten server owned by an ad-tech zombie company—five acquisitions later. The internet doesn’t forget; it hoards.

Every upload, like, and heart-eyed emoji can be stored, indexed, profiled, and sold. Not just by the platform, but by third-party trackers and scraping bots you’ll never see. You can delete a post; you can’t recall its copies.

Your child might walk into a job interview, a security-clearance check, or a first date in 2040 carrying a digital footprint built before they could spell their own name. That’s not “sharing memories.” That’s creating a permanent, unconsented archive of someone else’s life.

IV. Exploitation and “Sharenting”

No one means to exploit their kid. But “sharenting” is often the soft-launch of surveillance capitalism. It starts innocently: a milestone photo, a funny tantrum, a dance video for the relatives. Algorithms don’t run on sentiment; they run on engagement. Suddenly your kid’s face is racking up likes and dopamine hits. That cutesy content? It’s currency.

Some parents go further—sometimes unintentionally. Entire accounts revolve around the child. Memory-making morphs into monetization: ad deals, affiliate links, merch. This isn’t parenting; it’s production. Enter the kidfluencer—millions of followers before they lose their baby teeth, with few of the labor protections child actors get. No guaranteed income share. No clear boundaries between self and performance.

The deeper problem: turning childhood into content. We upload real joy, grief, boredom, confusion—for public consumption, without true consent or context—and we can’t predict how it will haunt them later. Kids deserve to grow up as people, not personal brands. They deserve memories, not metrics.

V. Safety and Privacy Risks (U.S.)

Faces become fuel. One “cute” photo can be scraped into facial-recognition systems, folded into AI training sets, or reused in disturbing ways—without consent. U.S. law mostly targets companies, not parents; and once models learn, deleting the post doesn’t untrain them. (Illinois’ biometric law is an exception, but it won’t rewind the internet.)

Backgrounds tell on you. School logos, bus numbers, house numbers, and local landmarks quietly reveal location. Frequent posts map routines—drop-off times, practices, weekly lessons.

Metadata snitches. Phones embed GPS (EXIF) in photos. Some platforms strip it; cloud shares and messaging apps often don’t.

AI supercharges misuse. Tools can fabricate sexualized deepfakes from ordinary photos, clone voices from short clips, and generate look-alikes that persist even after takedowns.

Stalking and doxxing are real. First names, birthdays, team schedules, and parent tags are enough to triangulate identity and location.

Collateral exposure. Advertisers and data brokers build “family graphs”—who lives together, what they buy, and likely schedules—turning childhood into a predictive profile.

Real-world example (U.S.). In 2023, New Jersey high-schoolers used basic AI apps to create sexualized deepfakes of classmates using Instagram photos—no hacking, just publicly shared images. Investigations followed, but the copies spread faster than any takedown.

VI. How Oversharing Teaches Surveillance as “Normal”

When kids grow up constantly displayed, boundaries start to feel weird instead of healthy. Overexposure trains them to perform, pose, repeat—while internalizing that privacy is optional. That invites self-censorship and anxiety later.

Privacy isn’t a luxury; it’s a right. Informational self-determination—choosing what to share, what to withhold, and with whom—is a basic liberty. Surveillance-driven business models inverted that right by turning people into the product. If reclaiming it breaks parts of Big Tech’s ad machinery, that’s the cost of fixing a failed system.

VII. Healthier Ways to Share (With Real Options)

Encrypted group chats (best for small family circles)

  • Signal (recommended): E2EE by default, disappearing messages, view-once media, built-in face-blur, no ad tracking.
  • Threema: E2EE, Swiss-based, no phone number required (paid), minimal metadata.
  • iMessage (Apple-only): E2EE between Apple devices; enable Advanced Data Protection for iCloud and avoid SMS fallback.
  • WhatsApp (use with care): E2EE for chats; turn on Encrypted Backups. Still lots of metadata—prefer Signal if possible.
  • Avoid for private family sharing: Telegram default chats (not E2EE for groups), social DMs tied to ad networks.

Private photo albums (no public links)

  • Ente Photos (recommended): True E2EE albums, family plans, cross-platform.
  • Proton Drive (Photos): E2EE storage with password-protected, expiring album links.
  • Cryptee Photos: Browser-based E2EE, no app install required.
  • Self-hosted (advanced): Nextcloud with E2EE folders; invite-only galleries.

Anonymize the image, not the moment

  • Prefer no-face angles and detail shots (trophies, cleats, cake).
  • Strip EXIF/GPS (Signal does; otherwise use an EXIF remover).
  • Blur/crop school logos, plates, street numbers. Use initials or nicknames.
  • Post after events, not in real time.

Tell the story without the selfie

  • Share a short note or audio, a tiny family newsletter (BCC), or password-protected albums.
  • Print photo books for grandparents—offline, durable, unsnoopable.

Ask kids first—and honor “no”

  • Three-green-lights rule: Kid says yes. You say yes. Privacy says yes. If any are red, don’t post.
  • Posting pact: No humiliating, medical, disciplinary, bath/bedroom, or real-time location posts.
  • Give kids veto power and show a preview before sharing.

5-minute setup (do this now)

  1. Pick your lane: Signal for chat, Ente/Proton Drive for albums.
  2. Enable disappearing messages and view-once for sensitive shares.
  3. Disable camera geotagging on all phones; scrub EXIF.
  4. Ban public links; use password + expiry when you must link.
  5. Tell relatives the rules: faces off, details off, private album only.


This isn’t a parent-shaming piece. It’s a look behind the curtain at the shadow pipeline that turns family moments into inventory—marketers, data brokers, stalkers, even government programs. The point isn’t fear; it’s stewardship.

Protect your child’s future autonomy and dignity. Leave them room to choose what becomes public—if anything—when they’re ready. That’s not withholding love; it’s respecting who they’re becoming. Share the moment, not the map of their life.



By Shad Khattab August 17, 2025
Born in the U.S., raised in an Egyptian household, having straddled two proud cultures my entire life, my BS detector is sharper than a deli slicer. Americans love to act like we invented freedom; Egyptians call Egypt, Umm el-Dunya (Mother of the World) and claim the whole world started on our block. Cute myths. Both are baloney—sliced grossly thick.. So of course the modern corporation— the world’s most dysfunctional anti-community club—does the same shtick: slap a fancy label on mystery meat and swear it’s “artisanal.” Step two in deconstructi ng your life away from Big Tech is Learn the lingo . Clock the newspeak . If it smells like corporate BS, don’t order it—send it back and ask for the truth on rye. (with extra mustard) The “Smart” Taxonomy Smart TV → ad terminal with a screen; ACR (Automatic Content Recognition) watches what you watch . Smart Speaker → an always-listening coupon dispenser with jokes. Smart Home / Hub → one app to track every room (and you) Smart Meter → fine-grained energy diary for your life patterns. Smart Doorbell / Cam → neighborhood watch, but for data brokers. Smart Car → rolling telemetry farm; your commute is content. Smart Fridge / Oven / Washer → firmware updates for boiling water. Smart Bed → intimate-moment analytics, now in graph form. Smart City → surveillance, but with street art. Smart Tags / Beacons → “lost & found” meets proximity tracking. Auto-translate: “smart” = has a mic/cam/modem/telemetry stack and a Terms of Service. Countermove (short version): buy “dumb” gear when you can; if not, isolate on guest/ VLAN, kill cloud features, block vendor domains at the router, and prefer local control (Home Assistant over mystery apps). Performance & "Personalization" gloss They just want to "personalize" your experience. But that personalized experience isn't just with their website it all encompassing of how you go through life. and personalized experiences are not always an amazing thing. Higher insurance rates, airline tickets, loan interest rates, job opportunities, living opportunities, it's all baked into your 2025 American experience. “Make the app run better” → turn on surveillance so we can A/B test you like a lab rat. “Improve your experience” → we’ll log everything you do, and save it forever. “Diagnostics & crash analytics” → because our product will eventually break, we will use this as an excuse to harvest your data. Telemetry plus bonus tracking. “Quality improvement data” → we need your data to justify next quarter’s roadmap. “Better recommendations” → profiling so precise it creeps out your therapist. “Tailored / relevant ads” → stalking, but with videos, graphic design and drama. “Interest-based advertising” → we built a dossier on you, your spouse, friends, children, neighbors; now we’ll rent it out. “Measurement partners” → adtech middlemen you’ve never heard of. “Cross-device linking” → your phone, laptop, TV, car = one person: you. Thank from of all of us at Big Tech “Optimize our services” → we’re training models on your behavior. “Experimentation” / “A/B testing” → dark-pattern lab work in production. “Preload / background activity” → runs when you’re not looking; talks to HQ. “High-precision location” → we want your front door, not your neighborhood. “Bluetooth/Wi-Fi scanning” → we can track you even with GPS “off.” “Contact discovery / address-book matching” → upload everyone you know, thanks. “People You May Know” → shadow-profile bingo using your contacts + metadata. Consent theater & privacy kabuki “We’ve updated our Privacy Policy” → we expanded data use; enjoy the novella. “Manage your privacy” → 7 screens and 42 toggles (default: ON). “Legitimate interests” (GDPR) → we decided we don’t need your consent. “Consent Management Platform (CMP)” → cookie banner obstacle course. “Partners / vendors list” → 300 companies you’ll never meaningfully audit. “Do Not Sell/Share” → sure, but we’ll “process” it instead. “Essential cookies” → analytics and ads wearing a mustache disguise. “Single Sign-On for security” → one login to track them all. “Data portability” → here’s a ZIP of gobbledygook; good luck. “Transparency report” → glossy PDF with no useful detail. “Privacy nutrition label” → marketing garnish; ingredients still secret. “End-to-end encrypted”* → *except backups, metadata, and “abuse review.” “On-device processing” → plus quiet uploads when we feel like it. “Differential privacy” → math words to make you stop asking questions. Safety-Washing & Well-Being “Trust & Safety” → under-funded moderation and PR fire drills. “Community standards” → rules (and exceptions) we enforce arbitrarily. “Brand safety” → we’ll protect advertisers; users, maybe later. “Digital well-being” / “Take a break” → timers that don’t dent revenue. “Pause history” → temporary amnesia; we still remember enough. “Family pairing / age assurance” → surveillance for kids with extra steps. Monetization, adtech, & data alchemy When they cant come up with a product that brings value and sustainability to the person, groups and society as a whole they revert to data extraction. “Service providers” → third parties that look a lot like data brokers. “Attribution / conversion tracking” → follow you from ad to checkout to couch. “Frequency capping” → we track every ad you’ve seen to show you more. “Audience insights” → we sliced your life into sellable segments. “Custom / lookalike audiences” → target you and your statistical twins. “Data clean room” → surveillance, but in a white lab coat. “Lift study / incrementality” → we’ll take credit for sales you were making anyway. “Native / branded content” → ads pretending to be journalism. “Creator fund / boost / promote” → pay to be visible on a platform you built. Dark patterns & growth-hacking “Streamlined onboarding” → we hid the opt-outs. “Nudges / gentle reminders” → psychological tricks to increase tracking. “Gamification / streaks” → variable rewards to keep you hooked. “Infinite scroll / autoplay” → extraction treadmill. “Re-engagement” → nagging disguised as notifications. “High-priority alerts” → marketing pings skipping your Do Not Disturb. “Device fingerprinting / probabilistic matching” → tracking without cookies. “Identity graph / MAID” → permanent ad ID with a cute acronym. “Shadow profiles” → dossiers on non-users built from your friends’ uploads. “Privacy by design” → slide in the deck; not in the backlog. AI-speak that means “we need more data” “Responsible AI / Ethical AI” → please don’t regulate us yet “Safety filters / guardrails” → vibes checks, not guarantees. “Human-in-the-loop” → underpaid contractors looking at your stuff. “Model improvement” → let us train on your content. “Hallucination reduction” → still wrong, just confidently. “Data governance” → the binder we wave at audit ors. Legalese & retention gotchas “As required by law” → we’ll hand it over and can’t tell you. “For research purposes” → broad license to experiment on your data. “Aggregated / de-identified / pseudonymous” → can be re-identified with effort. “Retention policy” → we keep it until the heat death of the universe. “Delete account” → deactivate now; actually delete… eventually… maybe. “Exceptional / lawful access” → backdoor with extra paperwork. “Data residency” → stored locally, accessed globally. “Standard contractual clauses” → trust us, the paperwork is airtight. “Legitimate business purposes” → universal permission slip. Platform & ecosystem glue words “Seamless ecosystem” → lock-in that feels silky. “Interoperability” → works great with our stuff. “Trusted partners” → companies that pay or get paid. “Security updates” → telemetry piggybacking on patches. “Beta / early access” → free QA labor + extra tracking. “Improve discoverability” → we’ll decide who gets seen. How to auto-translate in your head “Personalize” → profile. “Measure” → track. “Partner” → third-party data vacuum. “Research” → internal product/ads R&D. “Safety” → PR shield. “Choice” → maze. “Temporary” → until we quietly turn it back on. Quick user checklist (a.k.a. fight back) Kill “precise location,” Bluetooth scanning, and background activity. Don’t upload contacts; use “search by username” instead. Use email aliases and per-site passwords. Deny ad personalization at OS + platform + app levels. Prefer services with audited E2EE and short retention by default. Read data-sharing sections first; skip the brand poetry.
By Shad Khattab August 7, 2025
“If it’s free, you’re not the customer—you’re the side hustle.”
By Shad Khattab July 31, 2025
Zuboff brings the savage receipts
By shad Khattab July 28, 2025
Seriously. Why?
By shad Khattab July 26, 2025
It's time to leave the surveillence complex
By Shad Khattab July 24, 2025
STFU ROUTER!!!!!
By shad Khattab July 20, 2025
And it's just the beginning…
By Shad Khattab July 15, 2025
“Anonymized” data isn’t nameless; it’s name-adjacent. Strip out direct identifiers (name, email) and what’s left—ZIP code, birth date, device fingerprints, movement trails, purchase timestamps—still behaves like a fingerprint. Link that “anonymous” fingerprint to a few public crumbs and you’ve got a person. Think of it like guessing your neighbor from three facts: the car they drive, the time they leave, and the dog that hates Thursdays. You don’t need a badge, just cross-reference. Classic research showed how Massachusetts Governor William Weld’s “de-identified” hospital record was linked using voter rolls—ancient history that still lands. EPIC UCB-UMT The receipts: re-ID works disturbingly well Mobility traces are unique. A landmark 2013 study found four random spatiotemporal points (where/when you were) uniquely identified 95% of people in a 1.5M-user dataset. Your commute is basically a signature. PubMed Shopping metadata is just as telling. With three months of credit-card records for 1.1M people, four purchases (times/places) re-identified 90% of individuals—even when the data lacked names. DSpace@MIT ResearchGate Science Ratings, likes, and niche tastes can out you. Researchers linked “anonymous” Netflix Prize ratings to IMDb activity and identified users—revealing sensitive preferences in the process. Translation: your 2 a.m. documentary binge is not a secret handshake. UT Austin CS arXiv +1 Old-school demographics are enough. The combo of ZIP + full birth date + gender uniquely identifies the majority of Americans. It’s been replicated, explained, and used as a teaching example for decades. EPIC aboutmyinfo.org johndcook.com It’s not theoretical—it leaks into real life NYC taxi data fiasco (2014): “Anonymized” trip logs let sleuths tie rides to celebrities and even estimate tips by cross-matching paparazzi photos. If you can find Bradley Cooper’s fare, you can find anyone’s. Fast Company Gawker mathbabe Strava heatmap (2018 → ongoing cautionary tale): A public fitness “heat map” exposed patrol routes and locations of sensitive military sites worldwide. That wasn’t an exploit; it was default sharing plus easy linkage. The Guardian WIRED +1 Follow the money: there’s a full market for this Re-ID isn’t a hobby; it’s how a multi-hundred-billion-dollar data-broker economy stitches profiles together from ad trackers, SDKs, credit headers, geolocation pings, loyalty programs, and public records. Even the U.S. FTC has spent years warning that data brokers compile and sell massive dossiers with minimal transparency. Recent enforcement has targeted location data sellers precisely because those feeds can be linked to sensitive places—clinics, shelters, places of worship—i.e., instant re-identification in context. That’s not “maybe”; that’s the sales pitch. Federal Trade Commission +3 Federal Trade Commission +3 Federal Trade Commission +3 If you want a taste of 2025 reality: the FTC is still litigating against Kochava over the sale of precise geolocation data; courts let the case proceed this year, and the agency has already barred other brokers (X-Mode/Outlogic; later, Gravy Analytics and Mobilewalla) from selling sensitive location datasets. Translation: regulators know linking is trivial—and commercial. Federal Trade Commission +1 Hunton Andrews Kurth The Verge Reuters How the sausage gets made (a 60-second schematic) Collect: SDKs inside everyday apps hoover GPS, Wi-Fi, accelerometer, ad IDs, and more; websites drop cookies and grab browser/device fingerprints. Clean & stitch: Brokers and ad-tech vendors unify streams using stable keys (MAIDs, hashed emails, credit headers) and unstable ones (behavioral similarities, home/work location). Enrich: Public records, purchases, and third-party lists get fused to create “audience segments.” Sell & score: Insurers, marketers, political operatives, “risk intelligence” shops, and—yes—government buyers get access. That’s the industry. Not a magic trick; a pipeline. Federal Trade Commission +1 “But it was anonymized!”—why that promise flops Uniqueness: Human patterns (movement, shopping, streaming) are sparse and distinctive. You don’t need all the data; just a few anchor points. PubMed DSpace@MIT Auxiliary data is everywhere: Voter files, property records, social media, breach dumps, paparazzi shots—linkage fuel forever. The Netflix and NYC taxi cases only needed public crumbs. UT Austin CS Fast Company Anonymization ≠ immunity: Even NIST’s guidance documents catalog repeated failures of naïve de-identification in the wild. “We removed names” is about as protective as removing your license plate and leaving your VIN on the windshield. NIST Publications Why you should care (even if you’re “boring”) Because decisions get made about you using data like you: Eligibility & pricing: Insurance, lending, housing, and dynamic pricing systems sort you by patterns, not personality. Re-ID makes those patterns person-level and portable. Federal Trade Commission Safety & stigma: Location linkage to sensitive places enables targeted harassment, stalking, and discrimination. Regulators keep citing exactly these risks when they crack down. Federal Trade Commission +1 Okay, so what do you do? No need to move to a cabin; just stop being an all-you-can-eat buffet. Kill easy linkers: Reset/limit advertising IDs; deny “always” location; turn off precise location for apps that don’t need it. Use a modern privacy browser with tracker blocking and isolation; install uBlock Origin; separate profiles/containers. Use email aliases and a password manager; enable MFA/passkeys so one leak doesn’t link everything. Starve the broker pipeline: Opt out of major people-finder sites and freeze your credit; it won’t make you invisible, but it lowers the resale value of your profile. Audit smart devices; put IoT on a separate SSID; use DNS filtering to block the worst telemetry. Be boring in public: Post on a delay, shrink your audience, and skip broadcasting school/work/home routines. Your future self says thanks. The New York one-liner version “Anonymized data is like ‘boneless wings’—rebranded, still chicken.” “Your commute is a barcode; your shopping run is the price check.” “If data is the new oil, re-identification is the refinery.” “You’re not hiding; you’re negotiating—stop giving the other side your notes.” Bottom line: Re-identification persists because it pays. There’s steady demand, mature tooling, and a regulatory game of whack-a-mole. Treat anonymization promises like umbrella drinks—cute, sweet, and best enjoyed with a healthy dose of skepticism. Then build layers so when your data leaks (and it will), it drips, not floods.